Journal of Intelligent Management
JIM
Journal of Intelligent Management
Edited By: Editorial Office | Online ISSN: 3080-2350 | Print ISSN: 3008-1742
Latest issue cover
Latest IssueVolume 2, Issue 1June 2026
Submit via OJS

Abstract

In order to clarify the specific impact path of information technology on student learning interest and learning results, this study utilized informatization teaching tools such as MOOCs, IT-aided quizzes, video case analysis, etc. in a 3-month teaching experiment. Based on the grounded theory, this paper proposes an SRIO model to explain the influence of information technology on student learning effect and learning experience on the basis of student interviews. Meanwhile, this study further presents four positive paths to describe how the teaching content and form stimulate students and further influence their learning experience and results. The findings might have a marginal contribution to the research and practice of informatization teaching.

Keywords

Informatization teaching, Learning effects, Learning Experience, Grounded Theory, Qualitative study

Authors & Affiliations

Citation

Lv, Y. (2025). Path Analysis of the Influence of Informatization Teaching on the Learning Effect and Experience -Exploration research based on business courses teaching experiment. Journal of Intelligent Management, 1(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.64025/j.lmjim.25.151057

Metrics

Full Content

1 Introduction

With the development of technology, Internet Plus Education has become a hot topic in China, emphasizing the importance of information technology utilization in education.

At present, various digital teaching tools or informatization teaching tools (ITTs) have been used in Chinese colleges and universities. The most widely used functions include online courses, teaching-support tools, data-sharing platforms, etc. Among them, online courses attract the most attention from both academic and practical fields. During the pandemic period, a total of 1,454 colleges and universities across the country carried out online teaching, 1.03 million teachers offered 1.07 million courses online, totaling 12.26 million courses, and a total of 17.75 million college students participated in online learning [1]. Colleges and universities across the country can all get access to national excellent courses through the MOOC platform, realizing the wide-ranging resource sharing of course content and excellent teachers [2]. The integration of online and offline learning has also improved the flexibility of students' learning. At the same time, however, some students report difficulties in online learning and poor learning efficiency[3]. Therefore, online courses might not be considered as the main form of information-based teaching in colleges and universities. One of the main values of digital education tools is represented in the assistance of classroom teaching, and the education quality can be improved through effective combination between digital tools and offline education. Secondly, teaching-support tools such as UMU and Rain Classroom can assist teachers in classroom teaching through functions such as sign-in, quiz, voting, discussion, and teaching materials sharing, which is considered to exert a certain promotion effect on learning. Specifically, the sharing function and feedback function generated by the above tools are the key functions of information technology [4], which boost classroom interaction and indirectly improve the learning effects of higher education. Specifically, the functions of sharing, such as teaching slides and supplementary course materials, play a role in supporting the interaction between students and content, while feedback functions such as bullet screen and discussion take effect more in supporting the interaction between students, teachers, and their classmates [5]. However, how and in what path exactly these functions affect students' learning needs to be further clarified.To sum up, although a large number of information technology have been used in the college and university education at present, how to effectively integrate these various digial teaching tools remains an issue[6]. While enriching the practical teaching methods, the underlying scientific reason are also worth exploring.

References

Chinese Ministry of Education. Introduce the situation of online education in universities, primary and secondary schools during the epidemic and considerations for the next work. 2020. http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2020/51987/.

Zhang, B. W. (2023). The connotation, form and representation of college curriculum spillover effect under the background of digital transformation. Jiangsu Higher Education, 02, 80-85.

Wen, W., Zhou L., & Ma Z. X. (2023). Analysis of college students' online courses under the background of normalization of online education. Education Development Research, 43 (05), 28-36.

Wu, Y. C. J., Pan, C. I., & Yuan, C. H. (2017). Attitudes towards the use of information and communication technology in management education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36 (3), 243-254.

Yan, M. L., Chen, L. P., & Guo, J. (2022). How key functions of information technology affect multi-level learning effects-a mixed study based on student questionnaires and interviews. Jiangsu Higher Education, 06, 102-109.

Li, S. Y., & Yang, C. Z. (2008). Information-based teaching strategies focusing on learning styles. China Audio-visual Education, 09, 20-22.

Lei, G. (2010). New enlightenment of humanistic learning theory to educational technology. China Audio-visual Education, 06, 30-33.

Hu, J. M., & Zhao, L. Z. (2021). Development stages, influencing factors and stimulating paths of learning interest. Courses. Textbooks. Teaching Methods, 41 (11), 78-85.

Li, P., & Cao, L. H. (2021). Research on the relationship between college students' "learning interest", "self-efficacy", "learning anxiety" and "learning motivation" in advanced mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 30 (04), 97-102.

Ertmer, A. P., Newby, T. J., & Sheng, Q. L. (2004). Behaviorism, cognitivism and constructivism (Part 2)--Comparing their key characteristics from the perspective of instructional design. Audiovisual Education Research, 04, 27-31.

Xing, B. B., Liu, C., Zhao, L. L., & Fan, L. X. (2022). The impact of blended experimental teaching in colleges and universities on students' learning effectiveness and learning experience-taking the "Basic Chemistry" course as an example. Modern Educational Technology, 32 (02), 99-108.

Pu, X. S., & Kang, J. C. (2021). Academic performance, STEM interest and 21st century skills-analysis based on mediation effect model. Open Education Research, 27 (04): 71-84.

Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13: 23-52.

Wang. M. C., & Zhang, L. X. (2011). Performance and intervention strategies of college students' learning burnout. Education Exploration, 6: 143-144.

Ma, H. X., Nie, S. Y., & Su, S. J. (2010). Academic emotions of college students in examination situations. Psychological and Behavioral Research, 8 (03): 201-207 +222.

Zhuang, S. Y., Geng, J., & Shang, J. J. (2013). A case study on the implementation of tablet-based electronic textbooks in English classroom teaching in Hong Kong. Modern Distance Education Research, 2: 92-99.

Wang, B. B., Cheng, Y. Q., Wang, Y., Wang, D. D., & Li, Y. M. (2020) Research on the application of cloud teaching in the digital experimental class of chemistry normal students [J]. Chemistry Education (Chinese and English), 41 (04): 60-68.

Zhao, C. X. (2023). Guiding analysis of interest orientation in mathematics teaching. Chinese Journal of Education, S1: 89-90 +93.

Mo, L., & Hu, G. Q. (2014). Exploration of "Constructivist" Internal Control Course Teaching-Based on the Practical Perspective of Applied Undergraduate Teaching. Accounting Monthly, 24: 120-123.

Sun, Y. W., & Zhang, S. (2018). Research on the driving mechanism of social innovation in high-tech enterprises based on grounded theory. Business Research, 09: 129-134.

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential exploratory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, 18 (1).